Thursday, December 31, 2009

Previewing UNC-G


1 comments

Tonight at 6:00 p.m., broadcast on Fox Sports South



PPGFG%FT%3P%RPGORPGDRPGAPGTPGSPGBPGFPG
NCST 67.9 45.7 63.6 34.2 36.8 11.6 25.2 15.1 14.0 6.6 5.5 16.2
UNCG 61.9 38.5 69.9 31.1 35.9 15.1 20.8 9.4 16.5 6.2 2.5 17.0

Rank and Records NCST
UNCG
RPI#67
#196
Strength of Schedule#162
#46
Overall9-3
2-9
Conference0-1
1-1
Home5-1
0-4
Away1-2
2-4
Top 250-0
0-2
RPI Top 502-0
0-3


For an in-depth look at UNC-Greensboro's roster and who to watch for, swing by Backing The Pack for one of Steven's excellent pregame breakdowns.

This is a potentially dangerous game for the Pack...on the road, on a holiday eve, following a win and preceding a huge game against Florida. A lot of factors that could add up to bad news for State IF they don't come out prepared and focused. And given that they didn't exactly put away Winthrop after jumping all over them early, I have to wonder about this team's focus for 40 minutes.

Still, I expect State to win tonight. This is a team that's mediocre-to-bad at both ends of the court and should be vulnerable to State's size up front. If State executes and shows full-game focus, the Pack should be ringing in the new year with a "W."


View the complete entry of "Previewing UNC-G"

Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Back From The Dead: Winthrop Recap


6 comments

Hola!

No, I'm not dead. I did not perish in a horrible Christmas-lights stringing accident, nor did I choke on a chunk of 130-year-old re-gifted fruit cake. Work has been, well, work. Need I say more?

In any event, to my loyal readers I apologize, to both of you. I can't promise I'll be here any more than I have been of late, but I will try to not leave you wandering through the vast N.C. State sports blog wilderness--cold, naked and hungry--again.

Moving on...

I attended the Winthrop game last night. Following the box scores I'll share some thoughts:

StatGame
WinthropNorth-carolina-state
Points 52 68
FG Att 63 53
FG Made 20 26
FG Pct 31.7 49.1
FT Att 17 15
FT Made 9 6
FT Pct 52.9 40.0
3pt FG Att 18 21
3pt FG Made 3 10
3pt FG Pct 16.7 47.6
Rebounds 40 42
Off Rebs 14 8
Def Rebs 26 34
Team Rebs 4 3
Assists 9 21
Steals 8 3
Blocks 3 5
Turnovers 7 14
Fouls 17 16


  • I thought the team looked great to start the game, but as we have seen lately, they tend to either lose focus or take their foot off the gas once they build a big lead. That can lead to playing down to a team's level, which then leads to having a team like a Winthrop sneak up and beat you. Thankfully that wasn't the case last night, but there were times where I felt the Eagles might make a push.
  • State shot the ball really well at times, especially in the first half. It was great to see Scott Wood knock down three 3s in a row. Boy, if his confidence gets back to where it needs to be, look the hell out. My only beef regarding Scott Wood last night was not seeing him enough in the second half. If he starts a game that hot, he should stay in and keep shooting. He plays well enough on defense to justify his presence on the court even if he cools off a bit. It doesn't surprise me that Scott sat the bench most of the second half--Sidney's substitution pattern seems to be that he has no pattern--but I wasn't thrilled by it. Tough to complain about it after a double-digit win, though.
  • Tracy Smith had a merely average game, which is remarkable given the opponent. It was good to see Richard Howell step up, however, and provide some more scoring and rebounding from the froncourt.
  • Javier Gonzalez continues to grow as a point guard. Julius Mays continues to disappoint. The offensive flow with Javy in the game versus Mays is like night and day. I say let Mays get locked in at the two and spell Javy with Degand at the point, but only sparingly. In my mind, Javy should be playing 30+ minutes a night at the point and spelled only when needed.
  • Just three more tune-ups remain before the ACC season starts in earnest. The Pack faces UNC-G tomorrow night in a New Year's Eve affair, then Florida and Holy Cross come to town once the new year arrives. I can't say we know enough about the team now to reasonably predict how they will fare against the league competition, but I have a strong feeling State won't finish last. An NIT bid should be considered a good finish for a team picked 12th preseason, and is well within reach.


View the complete entry of "Back From The Dead: Winthrop Recap"

Sunday, December 20, 2009

Wake Forest LiveBlog Tonight


4 comments


View the complete entry of "Wake Forest LiveBlog Tonight"

Monday, December 14, 2009

Georgia Southern Recap


0 comments


StatGame
Georgia-southernNorth-carolina-state
Points 57 75
FG Att 55 51
FG Made 22 33
FG Pct 40.0 64.7
FT Att 16 9
FT Made 11 4
FT Pct 68.8 44.4
3pt FG Att 12 17
3pt FG Made 2 5
3pt FG Pct 16.7 29.4
Rebounds 26 31
Off Rebs 11 6
Def Rebs 15 25
Team Rebs 2 4
Assists 8 20
Steals 11 6
Blocks 3 4
Turnovers 8 15
Fouls 10 12

Obviously this game's a few days in the rear-view mirror but I did want to touch on it briefly before moving on.
  • State lost three of the four factors (off. rebounding %, turnover % and free-throw rate) and still won by nearly 20. That tells you just how much better the Pack was at generating buckets. They shot an effective field goal % of nearly 70%, and that number was hindered by their 3-point-shooting.
  • Dennis Horner continues to play well in his senior season. Sixteen points, nine rebounds (both career highs), three assists and a steal was his line against the Eagles. The question now becomes, as we start to wrap up the gimmies, can he step up at this level the rest of the way? He'll need to insist on remaining a factor in the games against Wake, Arizona and Florida instead of being content to let Tracy and/or others carry the load.
  • Twenty assists on 33 field goals...that's some damn good sharing of the basketball. And this on a night when Javy Gonzalez sat out the game nursing a sore hamstring. C.J. Williams led the way with five.
  • The only negative I can think to mention is that State gave up 11 offensive rebounds to a much smaller team. That simply can't happen. Granted, GSU was missing a lot of threes (2-12), which can lead to some long rebounds. Their off. rebounding % of 30.6 is a respectable number relative to the average of Div. 1 (33.1%). Still, given that State had a decided size advantage and still gave up that many offensive boards is concerning.
All in all, a nice win in the old barn, setting the table for Elon on Thursday night.


View the complete entry of "Georgia Southern Recap"

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Suck On THAT, Caulton Tudor! (GoGoRaleigh)


21 comments

GoGoRaleigh's Dana McCall fired off an excellent rebuttal to Caulton Tudor's meandering piece on the RBC Center, Wolfpack basketball and Herb Sendek (?) with his piece entitled "RBC Center Filling Fine."
Is Mickey McCarthy back from the dead? Today’s News & Observer Sports section features a hit-piece on the RBC Center by Caulton Tudor. The article implies that NCSU’s basketball attendance in the RBC Center is so poor, that NCSU should have stayed in Reynolds. It offers historical recounts by Tom Fetzer, Herb Sendek, and perennial Play-In-Game mastermind Les Robinson. When the RBC Center was merely a proposed project, each said that the planned building was too big, and NCSU basketball would suffer. Unfortunately the arguments put forth by these three as well as Tudor, ignore key factors and give weight to irrelevant ones.
Perhaps the best part of the piece is where he counters Tudor's blatant inclusion of second-hand quotes from Herb Sendek with this:
So why did average attendance during Sendek’s tenure fall so far short of the capacity of his ideal building? Probably because of Herb’s inability to recruit more than a handful of potential NBA players, his persistent scheduling of irrelevant non-conference foes, and the playing style of his teams. Upon Sendek’s departure his supporters said that Herb will finally go “somewhere he is appreciated”. Really? If Arizona State is that place, then why did only 7,948 bother to show up for last week’s game against Baylor? Why did only 6,800 people show up for the Arkansas-Pine-Bluff game just after the team had taken Duke to the bitter end on national television? Those numbers would make Reynolds look cavernous. On TV, his 14,000-seat arena looked absurd.


View the complete entry of "Suck On THAT, Caulton Tudor! (GoGoRaleigh)"

Javier Gonzalez Part Of Growing Trend Of Latinos In Basketball (SI Article)


2 comments

Sports Illustrated filed a piece regarding the growing number of Latinos in high-level basketball (Div 1 college and the pros), and I felt it was an article worth mentioning, given State's own Javier Gonzalez of Puerto Rico is starting at the point this season. Maryland's Greivis Vasquez of Venezuela is mentioned in the piece, as well.

Basketball has certainly become a global game, which means college coaches like Sidney Lowe have a potentially MUCH larger recruiting pool than they did 30, 20 or even just 10 years ago.


View the complete entry of "Javier Gonzalez Part Of Growing Trend Of Latinos In Basketball (SI Article)"

Thoughts Regarding Recruiting Budgets


1 comments

You probably saw this story from The Triangle Business Journal's Chris Baysden (friend and Technician alum) outlining the recruiting budgets of the local colleges.

If you have a subscription to TBJ you can read the full article (I don't), but the folks at SFN have shared the numbers of interest:
In 2008 NC State’s recruiting budget was $275k on football and $125 on men’s basketball.

UNC’s budget expenses totaled $629k on football and $175k on men’s basketball.

The league averages, according to an anonymous survey, were $350k (FB) and $133k (MBB).

When asked, Duke reported that it spends more than the league average on football.

Since Butch Davis has been in Chapel Hill, UNC’s budget for football recruiting has increased 24% up from $506k in 2006-07. The really sad part? Reports indicate that our trend is heading in the opposite direction. TOB’s budget was $325k last year, but has been decreased to $275k for 2009-10.
If you read on at SFN you can tell the folks are rather peased at the situation, and there is cause for concern, but my take is not as dire.

Yes, State should be spending more on its recruiting budget. There's no reason we should be below the league average and there certainly should be no reason why the number should ever decrease moving forward.

However, there's no reason we should ever spend $629K for football, either. After all, that $304K difference has to come from somewhere. How many football scholarships could you endow forever with that money? Five? Ten?

The article states that the vast majority of these expenses are travel and lodging; if Butch and his staff insist on flying first class and staying in five-star spots while Tom flies Southwest and kicks it at the Holiday Inn, who am I to argue? If at the end of the day it's about getting in the door of a recruit's home or attending a game in person, what difference does it make where the coach stays or how he got there?

Now, you want to ensure that the budget never limits a coach's means to get in front of a recruit. If the budget ever stands in the way of coach O'Brien flying out to see a player on the west coast or keeps him from bringing along a position coach, then that's a major problem and entirely unacceptable. And with the numbers as low as they are, maybe the budget is hamstringing the coach a bit. It's worth mentioning that Sidney Lowe offered up comments saying it's no big deal, but Tom wasn't quoted at all.

But assuming there's nothing holding coach O'Brien back in his recruiting efforts, monetarily, I don't have a huge problem with it. Let Butch wave his blank checks in front of our face...to me, I just see a coach wasting valuable athletic dollars.


View the complete entry of "Thoughts Regarding Recruiting Budgets"

Monday, December 7, 2009

Marquette Recap And Ramifications


3 comments



StatGame
North-carolina-stateMarquette
Points 77 73
FG Att 56 66
FG Made 30 25
FG Pct 53.6 37.9
FT Att 20 18
FT Made 10 14
FT Pct 50.0 77.8
3pt FG Att 12 22
3pt FG Made 7 9
3pt FG Pct 58.3 40.9
Rebounds 33 41
Off Rebs 10 20
Def Rebs 23 21
Team Rebs 3 5
Assists 22 17
Steals 14 9
Blocks 2 0
Turnovers 12 15
Fouls 16 18


I can't begin to tell you how big this game is for a young team like State. To go on the road, following a tough loss at home, and beat a superior team on their court after trailing 11 at the half is just remarkable. I'm not sure what Sidney told the team at halftime, but if you bottled it up and sold it, you'd make a fortune.

As bad as the team shot in the Northwestern game, they tipped the scales the other direction in the second half. State shot a mind-blowing 81.3% eFG% (20-28 from two and a perfect 4-4 from three) and scored 52 points to go from 11 down to 14 up, all in a matter of about 15 minutes. They got to that margin on this NASTY alley oop from Javy Gonzalez to Tracy Smith:



The final five minutes were an adventure at the free throw line. After pushing the lead back to 12 on an and-one from Tracy Smith at the 1:04 mark, State missed 7 of its last 10 free throw attempts. Further complicating matters was State's inability to prevent the Golden Eagles from drilling three treys in about :45.

But in the end the lead was large enough to hold and State settled the score from last year's buzzer-beater loss in the RBC Center.

This is the kind of win where, if everything breaks right over the course of the year, it would look really good on the resume of a bubble NCAA team. State would have to steal some wins in the league just to get to 8-8 and get into the conversation, but with the way this team is playing--fighting through adversity, sticking together even when the shots aren't falling--a .500 conference mark is certainly possible.

First things first, though: it needs to win the games it should win (Elon and Georgia Southern) to set the table for a big conference-opener against Wake Forest in Winston-Salem and a quick turnaround road-trip to Arizona--two very winnable games. Finish this stretch 4-0 and...well, let just say that some heads will start turning State's way as one of the surprise teams of the league thus far.

We just need to put some fannies in the RBC Center to cheer them on...


View the complete entry of "Marquette Recap And Ramifications"

Saturday, December 5, 2009

Marquette LiveBlog


0 comments

You can watch the game online here (MANY thanks to PackPride user frankcal20!):

http://www.justin.tv/skinsnation
password: redskins


View the complete entry of "Marquette LiveBlog"

Friday, December 4, 2009

News And Notes


1 comments

There's a good bit of random State what-not floating around the innerwebs today, so instead of cranking out a bunch of tiny posts, let me knock 'em all out here:


Let me know if I missed something.


View the complete entry of "News And Notes"

Sidney Blowin' Up The Phone Lines: 620TheBuzz Interview


0 comments


View the complete entry of "Sidney Blowin' Up The Phone Lines: 620TheBuzz Interview"

David Glenn Interview With Sidney Lowe


5 comments

I caught most of this on my lunch break yesterday. It's good stuff. Sidney is a great interviewee and you can tell folks like David Glenn love interacting with him.

Here's a link to the ACCSports.com page with the audio link, and for those that can't listen at work, some of Sid's quotes are transcribed.


View the complete entry of "David Glenn Interview With Sidney Lowe"

Thursday, December 3, 2009

Dereck Whittenburg Fired From Fordham


7 comments

Sad, but not surprising, news in the Wolfpack coaching tree:
Dereck Whittenburg has been fired in his seventh season as the basketball coach at Fordham after the Rams' 1-4 start.

Athletic director Frank McLaughlin announced the move Thursday and said assistant coach Jared Grasso will take over on an interim basis.

Whittenburg, the player who took the long shot that led to the winning basket for North Carolina State and Jim Valvano in the 1983 championship game, was 69-112 at Fordham.

His only season with an over-.500 record was 2006-07, when the Rams went 18-12. Fordham was 3-25 last season, including 1-15 in the Atlantic 10.

Whittenburg was head coach at Wagner for four seasons before going to Fordham. He led the Seahawks to the NCAA tournament in 2003.
The timing is a little interesting. Five games in? Really? Did you find out something in the fifth game you didn't know before the season started?

My guess is that, in an ever-competitive coaching job market, the folks at Fordham wanted to give Whitt time to get off to a blazing start but short of that they were probably going to ahead and get out in front of the job search process. You never want to be the last program looking to fill a vacancy, so in some senses, firing a guy-mid-season gives a program that headstart on other programs that may make a move after the year ends. It's sad, but it's business, too.

If he's planning to stay in coaching, here's hoping Whitt can land somewhere as an assistant with a top-level program and start working back up that ladder.


View the complete entry of "Dereck Whittenburg Fired From Fordham"

Set Your DVRs: Bass Pack To Be On TV Dec. 6th


1 comments

The Versus network will be airing on Sunday afternoon coverage of State's regional bass fishing title from lake Norman that occurred earlier this fall.
National Guard FLW College Fishing Northern Regional - Lake Norman Davidson, N.C. 12/6/09 12:30 p.m. - 1:30 p.m. ET
In other news, congrats to the fellas for getting the Wuffies right...someone must've busted their chops from the last time they took the stage.


View the complete entry of "Set Your DVRs: Bass Pack To Be On TV Dec. 6th"

Big 10 Takes The Challenge Title For First Time, 6-5


0 comments

And good for them. The way some of the teams played (Clemson, I'm looking right at you), the ACC didn't deserve to win it. Kudos to the Big 10 for taking the title and giving the ACC its first opportunity to reclaim it in 2010-2011.

I can't remember there being this many upsets in the matchups in recent years. State, Duke, Michigan St., Michigan, Minnesota and Clemson all dropped games to underdogs, with State, MSU, Michigan and Clemson all losing on their home courts. Credit to the unlikely victors in Miami and Boston College for keeping the score close.

In a way, I'm glad that the Big 10 finally won. It gives ACC schools something to get riled up about next season--reclaiming the "title." I know a lot of folks think that the Challenge is hokey and made-for-ESPN (which it is), but at this time of year leading up to exams, are there any other compelling storylines to talk about? Would folks rather talk about Georgia Tech's 13-point route of Siena last night? Just like the preseason tournaments, the Challenge doesn't mean much more than bragging rights, but at least it's something.

Hats off to the Big 10. We'll get you next year.


View the complete entry of "Big 10 Takes The Challenge Title For First Time, 6-5"

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

IndyWeek.com: "Being Dennis Horner"


1 comments

The Independent, a largely liberal weekly magazine produced locally here in the Triangle, will occasionally step out and do some sports articles of local interest. They usually come with a unique twist or different perspective than your run-of-the-mill sports piece from one of the local rags.

This one is no different. It's a look at Dennis Horner and the rest of the State basketball team as told by, well, Dennis Horner. But not really. The title is a play of off Spike Jonze's "Being John Malkovich," and the piece is meant to give you a look at the team from inside the mind of Horner. If you've seen the movie, it makes a bit more sense, but if not then the article may seem a bit odd.

Well, it's a bit odd either way.

In any event, it's not a slam piece so it has that going for it. Enjoy.


View the complete entry of "IndyWeek.com: "Being Dennis Horner""

State Pockets $640K+ From U2 Concert


0 comments

From yesterday's Charlotte Observer:
According to documents obtained through a public records request, Live Nation, the concert's promoter, paid N.C. State $300,000 to rent Carter-Finley Stadium.

Under the agreement with Live Nation, N.C. State also kept the proceeds from parking ($166,000) and food-and-beverage concessions ($175,858). The concert resulted in a net profit for N.C. State of $641,858 after expenses.

That's a significant one-day haul for a department whose operating budget for 2008-09 was about $39.1 million.

"It's a nice chunk of change," N.C. State athletic director Lee Fowler said. "It's something you'd like to do every year."


View the complete entry of "State Pockets $640K+ From U2 Concert"

Northwestern Recap


7 comments


StatGame
NorthwesternNorth-carolina-state
Points 65 53
FG Att 49 56
FG Made 24 19
FG Pct 49.0 33.9
FT Att 16 19
FT Made 11 13
FT Pct 68.8 68.4
3pt FG Att 14 18
3pt FG Made 6 2
3pt FG Pct 42.9 11.1
Rebounds 38 31
Off Rebs 10 12
Def Rebs 28 19
Team Rebs 5 5
Assists 11 10
Steals 9 9
Blocks 9 6
Turnovers 16 13
Fouls 16 15

Cold-shooting from the Pack and solid play from Northwestern defined this game. The Pack shot an abysmal 11% from beyond the arc (Javier Gonzalez hit the only two threes made by the Pack all night) and never shot better than 40% from the floor.

Northwestern, on the other hand, shot a filthy 58% from the floor in the first half. State stepped up the defensive pressure in the second half and got that number down to a more reasonable sub-40%, but the Pack offense never came around well enough to capitalize.

Gonzalez, Tracy Smith and Dennis Horner were the only effective players on the court last night. The contributions of everyone else were negligible, which is somewhat troubling if you're Sidney Lowe. The last thing you want is to have to keep shuffling lineups like last season in an effort to find a combination that works. The Pack needs more consistent play from its role players if it's to exceed this team's low expectations.


View the complete entry of "Northwestern Recap"

Stephen Tulloch Wins Wager With Alge Crumpler; Hilarity Ensues


2 comments

College rivalries die hard in the pro ranks. They usually manifest themselves in the way of friendly wagers between teammates when their alma maters face off against one another. Exhibit A: Stephen Tulloch and Alge Crumpler of the Tennessee Titans. With the Pack's 28-27 win over the Tar Heels, Alge had to man up and pay up:



Alge obviously looks thrilled. Maybe next year, big man.


View the complete entry of "Stephen Tulloch Wins Wager With Alge Crumpler; Hilarity Ensues"

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

A Look At Northwestern And The ACC/Big 10 Challenge


0 comments

Tonight at 7:00, ESPNU.



PPGFG%FT%3P%RPGORPGDRPGAPGTPGSPGBPGFPG
Northwestern NW 68.0 45.0 72.3 35.5 36.0 8.3 23.3 17.0 11.5 7.0 3.7 17.5
North-carolina-state NCST 66.0 44.4 71.6 35.1 39.4 10.6 26.0 14.0 13.8 6.4 5.6 14.8

Rank and Records NW
NCST
RPI#122
#30
Strength of Schedule#204
#143
Overall5-1
5-0
Conference0-0
0-0
Home3-1
4-0
Away2-0
1-0
Top 251-1
0-0
RPI Top 500-0
0-0


State faces Northwestern tonight in the second night of the ACC/Big 10 Challenge. Nobody does a better job of previewing opponents than Steven over at Backing The Pack, so I'll post a snippet here and encourage you to read the rest over there. It's good stuff.
"Perimeter-oriented" does not begin to describe Northwestern's offensive inclinations. It's more like "oops, we accidentally scored inside the arc" or "EXTREME!!!!!!" More than half of their field goal attempts have come from outside (25 3FGA per game) and they have five guys averaging 5+ 3FGA/40 minutes, which has those five on pace for 100+ 3FGAs this season. Bill Carmody's teams have always put up a lot of threes, but never quite like this. You can probably chalk it up to early-season wackiness.

The Wildcats had a top-50 offense in 2009 on the strength of those first two factors; 42.2% of their attempts came from outside, and they hit an impressive 38.6% of those threes. This year's team hasn't been as successful from beyond the arc--they miss Kevin Coble and Craig Moore, who combined for 390 3FGAs and hit them at a 40% clip in '09--and their offensive efficiency has suffered as a result, but this is still a good offense. The biggest test to date for NC State's defense, no question.
Expect a lot of zone tonight, so State's shooters will need to be on target from the perimeter, particularly Scott Wood and Dennis Horner.

Regarding the ACC/Big 10 Challenge, this could be the year where the Big 10 finally breaks through and wins this damn thing. They're off to a good start with a come-from-behind win of Penn St. over Virginia last night, and tonight's slate of games could easily go the Big 10's way, as well (Numbers in parentheses are current KenPom ratings):

State(46) vs. Northwestern(87): I'm pretty confident in this State team to take care of business tonight. It's at home which helps their cause, but playing against an unconventional offense and a defense that forces you into jump shots should raise cause for concern. I think the Pack wins a close (and achingly slow) one, 58-55.

Wake Forest(90) vs. Purdue(7)--ESPN, 7 pm: Wake's a good team, but Purdue is playing lights-out defense and is scoring the ball well, also. I don't see this going well for Dino's boys on the road. Purdue comfortably, 75-70.

Maryland(51) vs. Indiana(189)--ESPN2, 7:30 pm: Maryland has been disappointing thus far. Picked preseason as a top-25 team, they fell flat in Maui and are 4-2. Indiana is still rebuilding under Tom Crean but are struggling offensively. I agree with what Joe Ovies had to say this morning--when in doubt, go with Greivis. As in Vasquez. As in their tough-as-nails guard who's a holy terror to stop when he puts his mind to taking a game over. Maryland wins this on the road, 70-62.

Michigan St.(45) vs. UNC(75)--ESPN, 9 pm: The Tar Heels are struggling with guard play...when was the last time you heard that? Not since prior to the Raymond Felton days. Michigan St. has much better guards and still has plenty of talent down low to handle UNC's massive frontcourt lineups. Michigan St. wins this one easily I think, 83-69.

Virginia Tech(145) vs. Iowa(207)--ESPN2, 9:30 pm: Virginia Tech is struggling offensively, one of the worst teams in the country in effective FG% (42.6), and has had trouble putting away four teams with KenPom ratings above 230 for their four wins. They are playing some decent defense though, so they have that going for them. Iowa, however, is even worse. They lost a two-point game at home to Duquesne and have only two wins against two really bad teams. Virginia Tech always plays hard under Seth Greenberg, so I'm going with the Hokies on this one, 68-59.

So I see it shaking out 3-2 in favor of the ACC tonight, evening the series at 3-3. That sets the stage for Wednesday deciding the series, and just looking at the schedule it could go either way. It could come down to one game like it did last year, meaning every team needs to carry their own weight for the good of the league.


View the complete entry of "A Look At Northwestern And The ACC/Big 10 Challenge"

Monday, November 30, 2009

Look At All Those Pretty Green Numbers (KenPom.com)


3 comments

Particularly in the defensive column. (Don't even THINK about trying to make a free throw against this team, beech!)


On another note, State's 309th in tempo. Northwestern is 326th. Tomorrow's night game will make the Herb Sendek years look like the UNLV Runnin' Rebs of the 90s.


View the complete entry of "Look At All Those Pretty Green Numbers (KenPom.com)"

Bold, Completely Baseless Prediction (From Aug. 17th)


8 comments

(This post originally appeared on August 17th...not saying, just saying...maybe @Mix96NC is on to something...)

I'm going to throw something out there, based on nothing more than a hunch, fueled by a ton of buzz to the contrary:

Russell Wilson will NOT miss a start this season.

There, I said it.

It's just a hunch, and trust me, I've already knocked on wood, crossed my fingers, walked backwards under a ladder while carrying a black cat, etc, so we should be good. Don't come pointing fingers at me if it doesn't come to fruition.

Something tells me, with ALL the talk about how fragile Wilson is, how State's season rests on his remaining healthy, and how much the coaching staff has stressed the importance of Wilson protecting himself, Russell "Jesus Obama" Wilson will manage to start all 12 (and the 13th, assuming seven wins during the regular season) games this year.

I'm not saying he won't get dinged...it's foolish to predict ANY player won't miss a single snap. But I predict that any injuries sustained will be minor and Wilson starts all 12 games this year.


View the complete entry of "Bold, Completely Baseless Prediction (From Aug. 17th)"

Hey! Basketball! State 69, UNO 52


2 comments

Against UNO on Sunday afternoon, Tracy Smith played like a man with a handful of Skips and Wild Cards, dropping 20 on the Privateers to help push State to a 69-52 win over New Orleans.




Some notes on the game:
  • State did well playing defense without fouling. The Pack only committed nine fouls for the entire game, limiting UNO to just four free throw attempts (they made three). Conversely, State went to the line 25 times and hit 19 of them. That 16 differential in made FTs was nearly the margin of the game itself.

  • State blocked an amazing 14 shots. Dennis Horner had four, Tracy Smith had three and Jordan Vandenberg added another three in limited minutes. State's 14 blocks doubled their block total for the season to that point (14 over four games).

  • The Pack's guards protected the ball well. State finished with only 13 turnovers, and four of those came from the usually-sure-handed Tracy Smith. Javy Gonzalez finished with but two against eight assists--fantastic numbers.

  • The Pack has a quick turnaround to get ready for the Princeton-style offense of Northwestern as part of the ACC-Big 10 Challenge tomorrow night. A convincing win in that game would go a long way to serving notice that this "new look" N.C. State team is a threat and not a team to take lightly.


View the complete entry of "Hey! Basketball! State 69, UNO 52"

Tom O'Brien Has A Message For Anyone Cutting Up During The Alma Mater


4 comments


View the complete entry of "Tom O'Brien Has A Message For Anyone Cutting Up During The Alma Mater"

Saturday, November 28, 2009

State 28, UNC 27


3 comments

BOOM GOES THE DYNAMITE!

Wow. Allow me to pat myself on the back for a moment...I predicted that if State went without a turnover and protected the ball they would win this game, and they did.

Carolina's greatest scoring threat coming into this game was their defense, not their offense. By protecting the ball, State nullified their greatest threat.

But State's defense and special teams gets credit for stepping up when they needed it. They blocked a potential go-ahead FG attempt and then intercepted T.J. Yates to seal the deal. Awesome.

It's not an asswhooping like last year, but this one may be sweeter than the previous season. It was at home, it was the third in a row in the series and it came when State had nothing to play for and Carolina had everything to lose.

And they did. :)


View the complete entry of "State 28, UNC 27"

Bold Prediciton (That Will Hopefully Work Out Better Than That Clemson One)


1 comments

Yeah, so my track record with predictions hasn't been the greatest of late, but I'll throw another one out there: If State finishes the game with zero turnovers, it will finish victorious.

Carolina has won of late on the backs of defensive scores. They scored two touchdowns on interception returns against Boston College last week and nearly scored a third. They would punch that return in from the one, so I'll give the defense that score, as well. That's 21 points off turnovers and was the difference in the game.

Protect the ball and keep Carolina's defense out of the endzone, and State will win today.

Mark it down. (Just do it in pencil this time.)


View the complete entry of "Bold Prediciton (That Will Hopefully Work Out Better Than That Clemson One)"

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Why I'm Pulling For Duke Tonight


4 comments

Because the legend of Herb Sendek seems to grow each and every year.

Because the stream of Herb Sendek articles about how State screwed up in running him off to the desert of Arizona continue coming four years later.

Because folks from the national media refuse to take the time to look deeper into the history of our program to gain insight as to why we weren't satisfied with Sendek after 10 years.

So now I'm forced to pull FOR a bitter rival AGAINST a good man who represented this school well. I can't take another slam piece from Gary Parrish, Gregg Doyel or even a ride-the-fence piece like the one from Caulton Tudor today. The only way for the articles to end is for Arizona State to fall below State in prestige. If Herb loses the national media's belief that he's a great coach, then maybe--just maybe--the articles will cease.

For that to happen, they need to get stomped in games like this tonight. And so though I loathe Duke almost as much as I do Carolina, I hate articles like the ones mentioned above more. Because they paint my school, our basketball program and me and you as fans as a joke. And beyond the pangs of bruised pride reading these pieces, there are very real and tangible negative consequences on the recruiting trail that threaten to continue this cycle of suck we seem stuck on.

So go Duke. Go K. Stomp the sh*t out of Herb's Sun Devils. A loss to ASU would only further these slam pieces and that can't happen.


View the complete entry of "Why I'm Pulling For Duke Tonight"

ACC Round Table: Rivalry Edition. This Week We're Hosting!


0 comments

Well, it's the final week of the season, Rivalry Week, and it's also the final regular season edition of the ACC Round Table. I'm hosting this week and figured to toss out some rivalry-themed questions. I even managed to sneak in a barbecue question at the end with a rivalry twist.

My (yes, Brandon, insanely long) questions and their answers follow. You can find all of our Round Table contestants' entries here (yes, Block-C, I totally ripped your HTML).

From Old Virginia | College Game Balls | Gobbler Country
Jim Young, ACC Sports Journal | From the Rumble Seat | BCInterruption
Block-C | On the B.Rink

1) The ACC scheduling gods really did their best this year to ensure a true "rivalry" week to conclude the season. Here in North Carolina, the two large state schools (N.C. State and Carolina) and the two smaller private schools (Duke and Wake) face off against one another. Clemson, Georgia Tech, Florida State, Miami, Virginia and Virginia Tech all face off against in-state foes. Even the Boston College/Maryland game has a twinge of regional flavor to it, pitting the two northern-most schools of the ACC against one another. On paper, is this the best rivalry week lineup in recent memory?

The overwhelming consensus was that this year's rivalry week--while scheduled to set the table for some interesting matchups--pretty much arrives DOA.

Brian from BCInterruption pretty much sums up everyone's thoughts:
As for the rest of the conference, on paper this might be one of the best rivalry week lineups in recent memory. But on the field, these games leave a lot to be desired. I'm not sure anyone will care outside of each team's respective regions. No team is playing for bowl eligibility. Clemson and Georgia Tech are playing for nothing more than bragging rights. Only one of four NC teams is going bowling. Florida State is a three touchdown underdog to the Gators. Miami (Fla.)-South Florida isn't a rivalry game with only one game ever played between the two programs. And I'm sure Virginia Tech will take again take Virginia to the woodshed.

Nice attempt by the league's scheduling office, but much like this year's college football season, rivalry week seems to be a bit of a dud.
The rest of the questions and answers follow. Warning: Dial-up users, proceed with caution...massive text-age ahead.

(Continues)

2) Clemson and Georgia Tech will face one another in the ACC title game. Do you think both teams facing out-of-conference rivals the week prior will help or hurt either team's performance in the big game, depending on the outcomes of these rivalry games?

There wasn't quite the same consensus on this question as the first. Jim Young makes a case for these rivalry games being a negative the week prior to the title tilt:
I think it actually hurts their performances this week. It’s a weird situation. Whoever heard of a rivalry game as a potential “trap game”? Yet in the grand scheme of things, the games in Columbia and Atlanta don’t mean nearly as much as the one in Tampa.

Put it this way. Let’s say C.J. Spiller’s bum toe really starts acting up in the second quarter against the Gamecocks. Should Dabo Swinney rest him in the second half to make sure Spiller is ready to go the following week?

Ordinarily there’s no question about what Swinney should do. This week it’s at least debatable.
Gobbler Country takes a differing, more succinct look at it:
If you can't get up for a rivalry game you have no right to be in the conference title game. I vote that if they lose it should count as two ACC losses.
Winfield of From The Rumble Seat introduces math into the equation (which really hurts the brain on a Wednesday prior to Thanksgiving):
If we were only considering BCS championship games, the numbers don't really indicate much. Teams that lost their regular season finale are 6-8 all time in conference title games since the first SEC title game in 1992. Teams that lost the conference title game are 25-9 coming into the title game while teams that won the title game are 26-7-1 in their last regular season contest. I'm not jinxing GT or CU by any means because 18 out of 34 BCS conference title games were played by teams that both won their last regular season games. One game, the 1993 SEC title was played between two season finale losers - UF and Bammer.

To answer the question, yes, if either lose their finale, they'll lose the championship game. We're basing this thought on GT's demoralization in 2006 after a terrible loss to the dogs and eventual loss to the Demon Deacons (that, and Pat Nix). Clemson and GT don't deserve to play such pathetic SEC teams to finish the season but alas they are. If either gets upset, it'll be a pretty big blow to the ACC and the respective school's psyche going into the ACCCG.
Everyone seems to agree, however, that the potential for injuries is heightened in a rivalry game and that could have a big impact on the title game picture.

3) It's the tail end of the season and you know what that means: Coaching Carousel Time! I'm a firm believer in giving a coach five years to prove his worth before even considering a change...at least I was, until I saw how quickly Paul Johnson and Brian Kelly turned their respective programs into top-10 squads. With an ever-increasing desire from fanbases to WIN NOW, is five years still "industry standard," or can coaches legitimately be expected to show marked improvement in four years or less before finding a pink slip in their inbox? How bad would a situation have to be to fairly jettison a head coach before year five?

For this question, we turn first to From Old Virginia, the blogger representing the school with perhaps the most embattled head coach in the league in Al Groh.
I think it's perfectly fair to shorten that to three or four years. By year four, you've got all your guys in place and there's absolutely no excuses about learning a new system. You should be hitting your stride. Industry standard should be four, and if after three years the program is still foundering and there appears to be no reason to expect any improvement in the next season, then dropping the axe is also fair.
Jim Young of ACCSports.com weighs in with a broader perspective:
I still think five years is a good standard. Yes, Paul Johnson has made an immediate impact, but it also helps to make that impact when the previous coach has left you Jonathan Dwyer, Demaryius Thomas, Derrick Morgan, Morgan Burnett … you get my point. Plus, Johnson also happened to inherit a quarterback with the physical skills to run his system. Rich Rodriguez did not, and we all know how well that’s going at Michigan.

Speaking of RichRod, he may be the answer to that last question. Personally, I think he deserves more time. I believe his system can win. But right now, his abrasive personality isn’t helping fans of Big Blue stay patient.
Brandon from On The B.Rink uses Clemson's situation to illustrate his point:
Look at Clemson, possibly Bowden could have done what Dabo did this season with how inconsistent the Atlantic has been–but Swinney brought a whole new mentality to Clemson football and they are going to Tampa now. The five years theory really should depend upon the talent level he is left with–I don’t know how you gauge that though, but in some cases, it is clear. Sticking with the Clemson example, there is no way that Dabo gets 5 years if he went 6-6 four years in a row. Ultimately, there is no fairness in college coaching these days–you either win or your gone. I would say it is down to 3 years now for the standard and even that is kinda shaky.
And Willy Mac follows up with the Clemson perspective:
I think it depends on the situation, but three to five should be the given norm. Agreeing to this only fuels the beast that is the “What have you done for me lately attitude.” It’s a disgusting outlook on the game. Again, I said it depends on the situation. If Dabo had come in and laid two stank seasons in a row, I wouldn’t even want to give him a third. Especially if we lost to Carolina or did not so great in recruiting. In the end, five years still is and should be the industry standard. Hell, we gave our last coach twice that.
Winfield of From The Rumble Seat with the view of a school benefiting from the rapid success of a recent hire:
We gave Chan six years to show some marked improvement. He got some helluva good recruits but couldn't achieve the GT fanbase's collective goals: beat Georgie and win the ACC every once in a while. All in all, he is remembered for 6 failures against Georgie and big time flops against quality ACC teams. When he had time to scheme, he was a great coach. In games where there was no external motivation, his teams played like crap (ala Duke and UNC games).

It's all relative. Some coaches need time to rebuild programs like Wannstedt at Pitt while others can build instantly because of their unique offenses and the personnel they inherited (Paul Johnson).
Bottom line: There seems to be no real "standard." Coaching hiring, firing and the validity of a coach's seat temperature all differ on a case-by-case basis.

4) Certainly the four-letter network likes to pimp the big rivalries--Ohio State Vs. Michigan, Texas Vs. Oklahoma, etc.--but I think the ACC has quite a few solid rivalries that never get the coverage they deserve. Where do you think your school's rivalry rates in terms of passion, prestige and what's at stake each season? What steps--beyond the obvious "win more"--could be taken to improve the visibility of your team's rivalry matchup every year?

Brian from BCInterruption brings the funny:

Since BC doesn't have a rivalry game this week, I'll focus on the other ACC rivalries and what can be done to improve the visibility of these games:

  • Florida-Florida State - send ESPN College Gameday to campus to create buzz for a game that features a 21 point underdog (check)
  • Georgia Tech-Georgia - the Rambling Wreck runs over the next Uga. Too soon?
  • Clemson-South Carolina - more above .500 seasons for South Carolina in the SEC
  • NC State-North Carolina - these two teams play in a very rare college football doubleheader - in the final regular season game and the ACC Championship (try to hold back your laughter)
  • Wake Forest-Duke - disband both school's basketball programs citing budget shortfalls
  • Virginia-Virginia Tech - UVa hires Bud Foster as HC
  • Miami-South Florida - play more games against one another
Willy from Block-C offers his version of "reality:"
Honestly, as a traditionalist I have to say ours is the best. Now as a realist, I have to say ours is the best. In the nation. Just because more schools have more fans that will disagree a la a Texas or a Michigan, doesn’t mean I’m not right. And for those that nay say, let me ask you this: Has your rivalry ever reached the point of on field fisticuffs? Hell, one year way back in the day when Clemson lost Big Thursday down in Columbia our Cadets started taking shit over and forcefully held Cola with rifles until our professors went down there and calmed things down.
The folks in Virginia weigh in.

FOV:
Not very high. The combination of basically almost never having both teams be good at the same time and not having anything tangible to play for (i.e., Michigan/Ohio State lore is founded on the Rose Bowl as the every-year prize) combined to make the Virginia instate rivalry not too important in national eyes. And yes, "win more" would be a huge plus. But I think the right step has already been taken, and in 2007, it came to fruition, with the winner earning the ACCCG berth and the game on national TV. With the two teams in the same division, there's a good chance each year that the outcome of the game will have some kind of effect on the division title. That'll slowly but surely increase visibility.
CGB:
The Commonwealth Cup would become more than just a blip on the national radar if Virginia was more relevant and won the game once in a while. A rivalry loses its luster when one team continually shows up, gets slaughtered and is eaten up.
And Gobbler Country with a very solid idea:
I said this in the summer. The Hokies and Hoos need a better trophy. The Commonwealth Cup is stupid, should be replaced with something awesome and I think it should be a giant bust of George Washington. He was the father of our country and from Virginia, so he's a perfect choice. I want to see Virginia Tech seniors carry ol' George above their heads and I want to hear our fans chanting "we want head" as the second tick away on a Hokie victory. Other than winning, I think that's the best step to improving the visibility of our rivalry.
To follow up on Gobbler's point, I think the State/Carolina game needs a trophy, as well. In fact I tackled this proposition last season and, well, it's barbecue-themed. I may in fact be somewhat obsessed with barbecue.

Which brings me to the final and least-topical question of the affair:

5) Few rivalries in the South have as much tradition, passion and generated as much heated discussion as a good ol' fashioned barbecue debate. Here in North Carolina it's Eastern versus Lexington style, and a good many shouting matches have arisen between folks east of I-95 and those godless heathens that put ketchup and brown sugar in their "dip." No doubt similar verbal wars have been waged on behalf of your favorite barbecue, as well, so the question is this: In an all-out, Armageddon-type scenario where the righteous are separated from the unholy on the basis of what type of barbecue they bring to the judgment table, what style of barbecue are you bringing and who--among the purveyors of this style of 'cue in your state--will you select to be your Champion?

Perhaps no question divided the group into opposite camps than this. The answers ran from CGB's "Fuck barbecue" and FOV's "I might have gone to school in the South but I was born and raised in the North. And besides that, Virginia isn't really the barbecuing epicenter of the world anyway. You want barbecue debates, go to Alabama or something," to On The B.Rink's "This is quite an awesome question," and a range of answers in between.

Instead of condensing their opinions into bite-sized nuggets, I'll risk breaking the internets, throw caution to the wind and just repost their answers all in full. (If it took your machine five minutes to download this entry, I apologize in advance. And thanks to all the Round Table participants for their entries! Visit their sites! Click on their ads! Make them money!)

Brian from BCInterruption:
Eastern style? Lexington style? Hell if I know. I'll go with Brother Jimmy's style (the one on the Upper East Side, not the one near the Garden). Which type of barbecue is that?
College Game Balls:
Fuck barbecue, in Virginia we’re all about ham. But, if you’re putting a gun to my head, which if I read between the lines you are, I’m slow smoking my meats over a combination of charcoal and maple chips slathered in my homemade (Sweet Baby Ray’s) honey barbecue sauce.
From Old Virginia:
Alright, look, man. I might have gone to school in the South but I was born and raised in the North. And besides that, Virginia isn't really the barbecuing epicenter of the world anyway. You want barbecue debates, go to Alabama or something. It's not that we don't like barbecue, but damn if we don't find it a bit silly that you care that damn much. We don't really expect you to know the right way to order a coney dog or care which of the two rival establishments you get it from (and if you don't know what the hell I'm talking about or who these establishments are then you get the point), and we don't want to be pulled into a knock-down, drag-out fight over who has too much vinegar in their sauce.
On The B.Rink:
This is quite an awesome question. BBQ is so different from one part of the country to another. My parents grew up in Upstate NY and BBQ to them was chicken in a special vinegar-based sauce(good stuff too). In Memphis where I once lived, it was all about Gridley’s. In South Carolina now, there is a BBQ place on every corner seemingly that is not occupied by a church. My favorite now is the pork BBQ with a tomato-based sauce at Ole Country Smokehouse in Anderson, SC as mustard-based is gross(though they offer this also).
From The Rumble Seat:
Winfield wants a mustard base and Dane licks his chops when he hears "Mrs. Griffin's Barbecue sauce". Bird is a communist and doesn't like pork so he doesn't understand.
Because I don't live in the Commonwealth, I really can't give you a good answer for Virginny. But here in the 405 we are fortunate enough to have the best BBQ sauce I've ever experienced, Head Country. So even when you run into the occasional restaurant that has no idea how to cook a pig, you're still good to go if you have a bottle of Head Country. The best way to tell people who know BBQ vs. those who don't is ribs. If they like beef ribs, they aren't to be trusted and you're best to distance yourself from them. If they like pork ribs, they're good people. Virginia Tech = pork ribs. france = beef ribs.
Jim Young, ACCSports.com:
You’re putting me in an impossible position here. Whatever answer I give will earn me angry emails from whichever barbecue constituency I ignore.

It’s very similar to the questions about job openings that coaches get this time of year.

So allow me to use a little coachspeak in my answer.

“I’m extremely happy with my current style of barbecue. As of right now I have absolutely no reason to consider other styles. I look forward to many, many years of eating the style of barbecue that I prefer.”
And finally, Block-C's Willy Mac with the best answer of them all:
I don’t know where Chili stands on this issue, but as a man with an underground pig pit that I built myself in my backyard, I’ve found that three things are most important when talking about barbecue: BBQ is smoked pork, anything other meat doesn’t qualify; Never trust a BBQ joint that doesn’t serve both pulled and chopped pork; a sweeter sauce or mustard-based sauce are best for serving company. Personally, I love the Cheerwine sauce from Smokin’ Stokes off Augusta Road here in Greenville for any application on any meat. I’ve found through personal experience though that if you cook your pig with time and care, the people eating the pig shouldn’t need too much sauce. You need a nice seasoning and salt application to begin with. The next important part is consistency in temperature and the type of wood you use to smoke the beast. Lastly, when you flip the pig lather it with a whole jar of honey on the tenderloins, butts, and any other portion you deem necessary.
There you have it. God bless you if you made it this far. Even if the games don't have much riding on them, it should be a good final weekend of ACC football.


View the complete entry of "ACC Round Table: Rivalry Edition. This Week We're Hosting!"